Rewriting Fates

               It’s been a while since I’ve written in this blog and I miss it. I’ve been thinking about a potentially interesting topic to write about for a while and then I finally came up with this idea: Rewriting the plot of Fates to make it good.

               It’s no big secret that Fates has a pretty awful story and for many people that’s the most damning element about it. So for this post let’s rewrite the plot of Fates and see if there’s a way that we can salvage it. Here’s what I’ve come up with.


                   In spite of its awful execution Fates had the best premise that a Fire Emblem game has had for a plot: The main character is in a Theon Greyjoy type situation stuck between two warring kingdoms. One side is Corrin’s adopted family while the other side is Corrin’s biological family. Who should Corrin side with? It’s an amazing premise that screams moral ambiguity. Unfortunately this premise got undermined in the games. So how do we rewrite the story of Fates?



            1. The Hoshido royals are actually Corrin’s siblings: Making Corrin unrelated to Hoshido means that their claim of being Corrin’s family is a lie. Essentially Corrin is giving up their adoptive family for a group of strangers who are lying to them. That undermines the premise of the game so in this rewrite the Hoshido siblings are actually telling the truth. They are Corrin’s biological family.


              2. Eliminate Valla: Anankos and Valla are the biggest reasons why the plot of Fates went downhill. For one, having a third option that’s supposed to be “canon” is a total cop out. It presents an easy choice so that neither Corrin nor the player have to do the hard work of picking a side. Here Corrin doesn’t have to betray one side of their family. It also provided a lame reason why the war between Nohr and Hoshido started. There’s no moral ambiguity when both sides are being played like fiddles by Anankos. So for the rewrite we eliminate Anankos and Valla. This gives us some more room to write a better reason for the existence of the war and it gives the two kingdoms their agency back.


        3. Make Nohr less evil and Hoshido less good: Another problem with the plot in Fates is that Nohr is portrayed as bad and Hoshido is portrayed as good. In a normal Fire Emblem game that would be fine, but with a premise like the one in Fates that relies on moral ambiguity to work we need to have both sides be morally gray.


                          A few ways to do this would be to make Nohr look less like a Mordor knock off and to make Hoshido look less like Paradise. Have both kingdoms start that way, but over the course of the games Corrin and the player learn that the two kingdoms aren’t what they appear to be.


             Another method would be to make Garon more sympathetic and the Hoshido siblings (particularly Mikoto and Ryoma) look less so. Nohr might be a kingdom that focuses more on military strength, but you can write into their history that the way they are like that is because if they weren’t so strong their kingdom would never survive. Meanwhile Hoshido maybe peaceful and prosperous but the kingdom is run by xenophobic people and their upper classes are elitist. While there are other ways in which one could rewrite this, the point is to give both kingdoms their pros and cons.

                  The next thing we need to do is provide context for the war between the two nations. In this rewrite the player is never definitively told which kingdom is right and which one is wrong. Instead the game gives both kingdoms their sides of the story and the player has to make up their mind. Here’s a draft I’d like to propose. First, let’s start with the facts.

• Nohr is going through a terrible drought.

• Garon and Sumeragi decided to sign a treaty. As part of the agreement they will give each other their newborn children (Corrin and Azura) to prevent the other side from breaking said treaty. 

• Garon kills Sumeragi and flees back to Nohr with baby Corrin. Queen Mikoto declares war on Nohr afterward.

From here both countries give their version of the events and why there’s a war.

Hoshido’s Narrative: Hoshido claims that Garon broke the treaty by killing their king and that Nohr is trying to conquer their land as a means of providing themselves sustenance (essentially Hoshido is accusing Nohr of being like what Thracia was to Manster). As a further note, some of Hoshido’s western border used to be under Nohr’s control. Those people had revolted and Hoshido came to their aid. Ever since then Nohr’s been trying to get it back and this war is the excuse Nohr needed to retake land that once belonged to them.


Nohr’s Narrative: Garon claims that he received reliable information from his spies about Sumeragi planning to assassinate him. From Garon’s perspective either he was going to die or Sumeragi was going to die so Garon “shot first” a la Han Solo style.


Another point that Garon brings up is that the original treaty was that Hoshido would provide Nohr with food and supplies to keep them from starving while Nohr would provide Hoshido with military assistance in dealing with Hoshido’s “barbaric neighbors”. Garon claims that his spies told him that Hoshido’s neighbors weren’t actually “barbaric” and that signing the treaty would have forced Nohr into genocidal war against peaceful nations.


After the two kingdoms give their respective accounts of what happened Corrin, and by extension the player, have to make up their minds about who’s lying and who’s telling the truth. And again, the player is never given a definitive answer. The player has to make up their own mind. This leaves room for doubt moral ambiguity.


                  Then from here the story plays out from the perspectives of the differing nations. However, one change is that if you play the Conquest route Mikoto is the final boss, not Garon. If you play the Birthright route then Xander doesn’t look a tool for siding with Garon, his loyalty to his father is supposed to come across as more sympathetic and justified.
____________________________________________________________________________

Other rewrite notes

• Eliminate the S rank supports and marriage from the game: Baby dimensions were a dumb part of Fates. They’re not needed for this story so I wouldn’t have them here at all. 

       If I couldn’t have that and my hypothetical boss were to tell me that S rank supports absolutely had to make it into the game I would at least keep Corrin from being able to S rank their siblings. In this version Corrin is related to their Hoshidan siblings so we’re not going to have a player avatar commit incest. While Nohr may not be biologically related Corrin grew up with them and as far as Corrin’s concerned they are family so it would still be kind of weird and gross.

• My Castle happens in the real world: There’s no Astral plane in this version. My Castle is simply Corrin using the resources of their kingdom to make life better for both themselves and for whichever kingdom they’ve allied with.

• Rewriting certain characters: Garon would be actually sympathetic and not the mustache twirling bad guy that he was in the game. Iago would fall under the same category. Hans would either be written out or would also be given actual depth and nuance. 

Xander would always act like the warm big brother type of character that his supports portray him as. Camilla would be less creepy and would fit more into the “Onee-sama” or the Cool Big Sis tropes. Hinoka’s personality and backstory would be less Avatar-centric and Takumi would come across as less of a douche bag. Also Pieri’s personality would be radically different (for starters she wouldn’t be a bloodthirsty psycho). This would apply to a bunch of other characters but I think you get the point.



So let me know what you think, or if you’ve got a better idea on how to rewrite the story of Fates.

Guy’s Podcasts

                                          ^ Shadow Dragon Podcast

                                             ^ Awakening Podcast

                                             ^ Sacred Stones Podcast

The Radiant Dawn Podcast

The Blazing Sword Podcast

Defense Against The Dark Criticisms Part 6: Sammy

* Before I begin I should point out that Sammy's wall of text was originally longer. Many of her points have been answered in the previous posts. To save on time (and hopefully in the name of redundancy prevention) I'm only going to focus on the points she made that Braden and I responded to.

______________________________________________________________________

Sammy: "And I ended up being right on every account. Now I get it, the Greil Mercs are a hard shaft for a lot of people, but when you're more like me and you tend towards "eh" about the Greil Mercs, it really starts to show how underutilized the Dawn Brigade are. Underused, and underpowered. I never really felt any tension while going against the Dawn Brigade because they're, in narrative and stats, absolute mooks when compared to the Greil Mercenaries. So from the gameplay perspective, this makes extremely eclectic difficulty scaling where playing as these guys against the GMs is like setting my 25 pound puggle up against fucking Satan or something, and playing the GMs against the DB is like going to war with ants."

Braden: Narratively, this is intentional. Gameplay-wise, this works in favor of the DB in terms of making the game challenging and fun, but playing the GMs against the DB directly usually isn't as interesting, admittedly.

Grant: During my last playthroughs of the Tellius games I noticed that they do a pretty good job at fusing their gameplay with their narrative, even when it comes at the detriment of the game. This is one of those times. It makes perfect sense from a narrative standpoint that the GM's would be far superior to the Dawn Brigade in terms of battlefield prowess. Only a handful of Dawn Brigade members fought alongside the GM's during the Mad King's War so the GM's would be the more experienced army. Not only that, but Daein recently got its butt kicked during the events of PoR so their military might isn't going to be as good. Last, but not least, yeah RD has some of the worst unit balancing in the series. I'm not going to bother defending that one. That being said there's at least some good that can come from this.

_________________________________________________________________

Sammy: "Narratively is probably worse though. I feel personally like Radiant Dawn actively degrades itself by simply going back to the fanservice of the GM as early as Part 3 rather than give the DB the time that they truly do deserve. All of them are interesting to likable characters, and the amount of time you have with them is too minimal to expand that. The only one that doesn't feel like a throwaway is Micaiah, but even then, the pervasiveness of the Greil Mercenaries in Part 3 forces her to act more stupid than we, the audience, know she actually is. You can do controlling two opposite sides without making one side the obvious weak and more stupid side just by nature.

Braden: The idea that the DB should've had more chapters is completely correct and something I agree with, but the idea that the GMs returning when they did degrades them is just wrong. The GMs are still an important part of the narrative. The idea that the DB should've had more chapters is completely correct and something I agree with, but the idea that the GMs returning when they did degrades them is just wrong. The GMs are still an important part of the narrative. The DB doesn't act in a stupid way, just in a way out of obligation. They actually have the harder and often more interesting choice to make. Their weakness is part of what makes them one of the best parts of Part 3, in that they are forced into a grueling struggle despite being outmatched. Micaiah and the others are very admirable, and I found that I really got sucked into their personal struggle and how trapped they were. Their despair was written really well.

Grant: Having the GM's in the story is not fanservice. Radiant Dawn was never meant to be solely Micaiah or the Dawn Brigade's story. Ike and the GM's have every right to be there. It also makes more sense to have the hero of the last game show up in the sequel too. This isn't the first time I've seen someone say that the Dawn Brigade members would've been more interesting had they been given screen time. I'm highly skeptical of this reasoning. The Dawn Brigade did not consist of interesting characters based on what we already have. If they had been given more screen time we could've gotten a much more boring game. Neither Micaiah nor the DB "act stupid" either. They're in the positions that they're in because of the Blood Pact.

_____________________________________________________________

Sammy: "Radiant Dawn jerks itself off to ignoring the potential for subtlety and prides itself on Ike's side always being right, and anyone-but-Ike either being villainous, misled, or straight up incompetent. Which is fine, not every narrative needs to have 50 shades of moral grey, but the result is that the entire Dawn Brigade is effectively thrown away. If you have the Dawn Brigade be NPCs and the game starts at Part 3, it would feel like a very similar game to how it does already.

Braden: This couldn't be further from the truth. The Dawn Brigade is a necessary parallel to Ike and the GMs in terms of the position they are put into. Ike and the GMs are able to make the choice they believe in and fight to defend it, whereas the GMs are forced into fighting for something they have no convictions for, only for the sake of fighting. The goal of this is to try and explain that conflict has purpose as long as it is done for the right reasons. Ironic that Sammy would call this ignoring the idea of subtletly when RD is swamped in it. especially with all its symbolism.

Grant: This criticism feels like a rehash of the "RD demonizes Micaiah" critique that we already addressed before. Still, I think our answer bears repeating because this accusation is continuously repeated: Radiant Dawn does not demonize Micaiah! Even when both she and the Dawn Brigade are fighting against Ike the game goes out of its way to keep the DB sympathetic. The only reason why they're in the fight to begin with is because they're forced to be there against their will.

________________________________________________________________

Sammy: "-The villains. Lmao, the villains. Honestly, the quality of villain writing in Radiant Dawn and Fates is way more comparable than it should be. Sephiran probably stands out above the pile of Fates shitters, but aside from him... what meaningfully makes Lekain any less comically EEEEVIILLLLL than Garon? Honestly, I can't think of anything at all. Their cause? Evil for the sake of being evil. Their means? Ridiculous plot devices that are at best, lackluster, and at worst degrade terribly from the quality of characters that once upon a time had potential, like Naesala. "

Braden: This is something the game doesn't do a great job of explaining, one of its subtleties (that Sammy seems to think doesn't exist). Lekain and the other senators are representatives of the past, the humanity of before. They are the stepping stone that humanity as a whole must overcome to grow past the rift that exists between beorc and laguz. What the game explains is that oftentimes, conflict is the method that this rift is overcome (whether that be through something as minor as arguments or something as major as war). That's why the parallel I mentioned in the previous comment, the one between the DB and the GMs, is so important, as it establishes the idea that conflict is sometimes necessary. The end of RD is a culmination of this, first overcoming those symbols of the old humanity (the senators representing the hate and racism of the past), and then the symbols of the gods themselves (order and chaos). RD's finale says, "We've surpassed our own weaknesses in the past and will continue to do so, not by some strict adherence to order or chaos, but by a balance of the two of them". The game frames that splitting of the original goddess Ashunera as a huge mistake. In the words of Sephiran: "But...to nullify half of your being... We were terribly, monstrously wrong to suggest it." Humans of Tellius are an image of their gods, and it was their wholeness in this sense when compared to the divided Ashera and Yune that led them to overcome them. I'll concede that the characters themselves didn't need to suffer for the sake of their symbolic importance. They could definitely have worked towards both. But to put them on the same tier as Fates villains completely discredits what they mean to RD beyond just their personalities.

I talked about this [plot devices] in a previous post, but in short, they are important thematic tools and aren't bad at all.

Grant: "A small wealthy, corrupt, privileged, incompetent elite belonging to a military powerhouse nation that screw things up for everybody. Where have I heard this before? Seriously though, people like the Begnion Senate exist in real life and have existed in real life. Garon doesn't have that going for him. When Corrin proves their loyalty to him he goes out of his way to call Corrin a traitor. Why? Because reasons. The reason behind the invasion of Hoshido is neither non-existent or really weak. By contrast, we know why Lekain and the Senate do what they do."

_________________________________________________________________

Sammy: "My main complaint about the gameplay, as someone who frankly doesn't give a fuck about Biorhythm one way or another (it works in my favor just as often as it works against me, statistically, so I don't care enough to berate it), is just that it's too easily curb stomped. Notoriously Haar is the worst offender of this, but this game is lowmanning purism. "

Grant: "Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat? This is the game that's "too easily curb stomped"? Here's a list of games that are considerably easier to curb stomp than Radiant Dawn: - Holy War - Sacred Stones - Blazing Sword - FE 3 Book 2: Mystery of the Emblem - Gaiden / Echoes - Path of Radiance - Birthright - Revelations - Awakening - FE 1 ^ Radiant Dawn is significantly more challenging than all those games. If this game is "too easily curb stomped" then Fire Emblem as a whole is pretty easily curb stomped. If anything, Radiant Dawn actually poses a challenge. The Dawn Brigade chapters can be legitimately tough since a significant portion of the cast has the defense of toilet paper. Enemies are also tougher than average too. Granted, it's not the DS games, Thracia or Conquest but RD is one of the handful of games in the series that actually isn't a total pushover 100 % of the way through.

"Lowmaning purism" is an odd criticism to make given that the game forces the player to switch around so many different parties that the player has to build up multiple units at least to some degree. 

While I agree that the unit balance in this game sucks I can think of plenty of other games that fit the definition of "low-manning purism" better than this game: 

- Holy War 

- Sacred Stones 

- Awakening 

- Birthright 

- FE 1 / Shadow Dragon

Also, as I mentioned before, juggernauting is an issue with the series, not just Radiant Dawn. Even games with better unit balance like Thracia or Mystery can be beaten with only a handful of super powerful units or warp-skipped. 

My overall point here is that if you're going to criticize Radiant Dawn for doing the same thing as the series, then shouldn't you be criticizing the series for having this issue?"

Defense Against The Dark Criticisms Part 5: More Gameplay Criticisms

Criticism: Largo isn't Playable

DRP: And yet so many previous NPCs now are.

 Grant: One criticism of Radiant Dawn that I agree with is that it has poor unit balancing. I still feel like it was a mistake to bring back virtually the entire cast from Path of Radiance back to Radiant Dawn. It’s WAY harder to get unit balancing right when you have to balance over 70 characters versus a cast of just over 40. If anything I think more characters should have either gotten the “Largo treatment” ie written out of the story and made unplayable OR they should have been killed off during the events of Path of Radiance. Either way, I don’t see Largo’s lack of playability as an issue. 

Alan: But Calill gets his stat bonuses. I think it’s only fair that a man who pins tigers for fun lost an arm and isn’t able to fight so well anymore.

Braden: rip the dream. Calill consumed his gains (transfer bonuses) to grow stronker

______________________________________________________________________

• Olivier Cadieux talking about Chapter 4 - 3:
• “Fuck this map
• ...
• I guess I'll still have to say why lol
• It's a giant desert map filled with status staves and lots of dangerous enemies - but the worst part is that this map has a route objective despite everything I have mentioned above.
• 
  
• Oh, and I *think* most of the staves are enemy only, tho I might be wrong”

DRP: I can’t hear your criticisms over the sounds of me shouting in delight as I slaughter everything in this desert with Naesala while gaining Baselard and Stefan and watching the Black Knight kick ass one last time.

Alan: The problems here are over exaggerated. Yes, it’s a rout map on a desert. However, there is only one status staff in the enemy’s midst, being a silence staff, and there are several precautions made to keep this map from being TOO MUCH of a slog. The game gives you a great number of fliers, mages, and laguz in the default Silver Army, meaning that while many units will be slowed down in this map, a great amount of the ones the game tries to give you won’t be.

_______________________________________________________________

Criticism: Sothe randomly becomes important. He went from a completely forgettable character in Path of Radiance to being one of the main characters in Radiant Dawn.

Braden: I don’t really understand this criticism. Wouldn’t it be a bit of plot convenience for him to be important for no reason in PoR? The fact that Sothe becomes much more relevant based on where he his and what/who he’s involved with makes the world feel much more real.

____________________________________________

Defense Against The Dark Criticisms Part 4: Gameplay Criticisms

Criticism: The Dawn Brigade SUCKS both narratively and in gameplay

Marm: The Dawn Brigade tells one of Fire Emblem’s most compelling stories, arguably. What happens after the tyrant is deposed? It’s our first time taking the perspective of the occupied citizens of a country, and our first time taking the side of the defeated Enemy, with a capital E. It’s an important story to tell: there are still people there, and they’re going to be treated just as terribly as the occupied Crimeans of the previous game. Can you call your heroes just, then? Can you call them good? Maybe you can still do that, but you can’t call them flawless. Micaiah’s side serves the purpose of showing there is no blameless side in war. 

Gameplay-wise, the Dawn Brigade offers some of the most fun challenges in the series, partly owing to the fact that they’re woefully underpowered compared to the rest of the cast. It is well-woven into the narrative, too-- You play as a bunch of scrap fighters vying for freedom. Most of your squad isn’t even properly trained in combat. Nolan’s a merchant, Micaiah’s a fortune teller, Leonardo and Edward are just a couple street urchins with a strong sense of justice. Even Sothe. This last one might have experience in war, more so than most, but he’s still just a thief; he’s not meant to be a combat unit, and he’s definitely not an officer or a tactician or anything of the sort. 


As hard as the river chapter, the laguz brigands chapter or the defend chapters against the GMs are, they offer some of the most compelling challenges in FE. 



Braden: The role the Dawn Brigade plays is a great one, just as Marm said. I do agree though that lack of real support conversations in the game hurt the newly introduced characters (although some of this is remedied in the Tellius Recollection books, where Edward, Leonardo, and Nolan all get some established backstory). Beyond that, I also agree with Marm on how fun it is to be challenged during the DB chapters, I just think that they needed some more playtime to catch up to the rest of the cast by the time Part 4 rolls around.

______________________________________________________________

Criticism: Haar trivializes the whole game

Marm: First, while Haar has amazing availability for Radiant Dawn, he’s still unavailable on half the maps you play. Technicality aside, the point is that Haar is overpowered. That’s not exactly wrong, but it’s not exactly right, either. We, the fire emblem fandom, are well aware of just how powerful the man is, and through us that knowledge has spread. Knowingly, most of us will invest a lot of early part 2 exp into Haar to really maximize his efficiency and make the harder part 2 and part 3 maps easier, to say nothing of part 4 onwards. Some people will even have him and Lucia promoted to tier 3 by the end of Part 2 by really abusing their exp intake.

We need to remind ourselves that that is not how most players play. 



The average player, who isn’t as invested into the series as we are, or who is playing the game for the first time, will not have foresight into the rest of the game. Haar remains a powerful unit, but without that prior knowledge, it’s hard for him to become the gamebreaking unit that he possibly can be. 


And even if he is, I posit that that is not a bad thing. Numerous fire emblem games have characters that are overpowered and make challenge and ltc runs dramatically easier. Think along the lines of Seth from Sacred Stones or Sigurd in FE4 part 1. All of them trivialize the difficulty of their games when put into the hands of seasoned players who’ve done a prior playthrough. In a way, learning to maximize their battle prowess and make the game faster and easier is the reward you get for returning to the game another time. 

Grant: Having an OP juggernaut is not a problem unique to Radiant Dawn. Every Fire Emblem game in the franchise has at least one, if not several. If you’re going to criticize Radiant Dawn for this you should at least be consistent and criticize every game since they all do it. This is why I devoted an entire post to this subject 3 years ago in my “10 Tips to Improve the Series” list: 

http://thecrusadergrant.blogspot.com/2015/11/ten-tips-to-improve-fire-emblem-5.html


   It’s a problem with the franchise, not just one particular game. While I’m on the topic of pointing out patterns I’ve noticed something about the Fire Emblem fandom as a whole: When it comes to criticizing balance we tend to criticize balancing issues in games we don’t like while turning a blind eye for the games that we do like. Most of the people who criticize Haar being OP in Radiant Dawn generally don’t criticize Sacred Stones where Seth’s dominance is a much bigger problem or Sigurd dominating Holy War or Marcus dominating FE 7.  

Alan: It’s hard to trivialize an entire game when you’re limited to acting in less than half of it. Yes, Haar is extremely powerful, but it’s literally impossible to make the game easier during the parts where you aren’t there.

___________________________________________________________________

Criticism: You can 1 turn Part 2 Endgame: Elincia’s Gambit.

 Grant: On the one hand it’s true that you can 1 turn Elincia’s Gambit. I agree with the criticism that this map is poorly designed. If I were doing a map design series on Radiant Dawn and came to this map I would rate it as a “fail”. So why am I bothering to type something about it in a Radiant Dawn “Defense Against the Dark Arts Criticisms” post? Well Elincia’s Gambit is poorly designed but the hate against it feels disproportionate to the amount of suckage it provides.

   For starters I wouldn’t even rate Elincia’s Gambit in a “Top 10 Worst Designed Maps” list. Yes it sucks and can be easily trivialized, but it’s FAR from the worst map designed in the series thus far. One point that my Map Design Ratings series brought into focus was that no Fire Emblem game has perfect map design across the board. Every Fire Emblem game, including Thracia 776 (the game with the best map design in the series), has at least a few poorly designed maps. Here’s a small, non-comprehensive list of maps that in my opinion are more poorly designed than Elincia’s Gambit:

Phantom Ship (Ephraim Route in Sacred Stones): This map has Fog of War, which means that it actively holds information back from the player. Space is so limited that unit positioning hardly matters and waiting for unknown flying enemies to pop up out of nowhere is really bad design. At least Elincia’s Gambit can be finished quickly. 

Anri’s Way (Fire Emblem 3 Book 2, Chapter 11): Oh boy! A desert map with large chunks of empty space that serves no purpose. Did I also mention that it has super weak enemies too? Terrific! But wait, there’s more! How could we forget that tedious desert gimmick that over incentivizes fliers and becomes a slog for most infantry units? 

Chapter 24x of Thracia 776: Super cheap warp tile gimmicks for the fail! Also, fog of war exists. Meanwhile enemy bishops warp enemies at you. 

The Furry Genocide chapter from Conquest (aka Chapter 19): Super annoying gimmick that drags out the entire pace of the map in addition to enemies that punish weak units but don’t stand a chance against the player’s best units. Did someone say lowmanning? Oh and did I mention that a Beast Killer obliterates every unit on the map?


The sad thing is that I can keep on giving example after example of maps that suck way harder than Elincia’s Gambit. The point here is that it’s not worth the HUGE amounts of hate that I see it get. Heck, the desert map in Part 4 of Radiant Dawn is more poorly designed than Elincia’s Gambit. So in conclusion: Yes Elincia’s Gambit sucks, but it’s not the worst map by a long shot

Marm: In my opinion Elincia’s gambit is one of the best maps in the series. It doesn’t matter that you can 1 or 2 turn it-- this speaks to the ingenuity of the players, if anything. 1 turning with Haar requires significant investment in him, whilst 1 turning with Elincia requires the foresight of removing Mercy from her skillset. 

To a larger extent, so many maps can be 1 or 2 turned in Fire Emblem in general, and no one ever calls those out. Warp skipping, dancing, flying and rescuing shenanigans, shove shenanigans in PoR.. I’ve done drafts and ltcs before. If your goal is to cheese FE, then you’ll cheese it. It’s inherent to the ingenuity of the series. (Notable exception to FE4, owing to its awfully large maps-- there’s a limit to what you can do). Is it a bad map for rewarding you for using the tools at your disposal? I think not. A player that wants to gain their exp or employ a safe defensive strategy will have a lot of fun in Elincia’s gambit. 

Alan: Elincia’s Gambit is one of the most memorable maps for me in Radiant Dawn. As a dumb child, I spent about a week trying to clear it because I didn’t realize that Elincia was basically a War Goddess disguised as a support unit. Then, I saw that you can one turn it with Elincia and I was flabbergasted. Everything you do in order to do it seems like a violation of common sense - there are crossbowmen in range to shoot Elincia down, and they would if Ludveck weren’t so quick on the draw. It’s ridiculous. 

That said, there are plenty of really nice items that you miss out on if you one turn the map. The nullify scroll, a silver greatlance, an energy drop, Olivi Grass, and a possible dracoshield can all be claimed on this map in one way or another. As such, playing this map casually can be a joy, but the LTC option that breaks the map is an option as well. It all depends on how you’re playing the map.

________________________________________________________________________

Criticism: Laguz units who aren't Royals suck. Laguz Royals 2 OP Plox Nerf.

Marm: Laguz units are definitely an issue in this game, in that not only are they kind of awful in general, but even if you decide to use them, you’re limited to one or two owing to their over reliance on items like Olivi grass and laguz stones. Volug being half-shift-locked in part 1 really doesn’t help, either. 

Still, raising laguz units and learning to abuse their exp gain by having them receive attacks and retaliate in human form is part of the fun. Granted, that’s really all there is to be said on this topic, since all of the regular laguz are overshadowed in the end by…

The laguz royals, which are what I’m actually aiming to defend in this post. See, the laguz royals are the end result of gameplay and story integration, in which we know for a fact, for we’ve been told numerous times by the point we even get Nailah, that Laguz societies let their most powerful warrior lead the tribe. It stands to reason, then, that all of these incredibly powerful characters, lore-wise, should be equally powerful gameplay-wise. How underwhelming would it be if you finally got your hands on Caineghis or Tibarn and it turned out that they sucked, or just performed about as well as your other units? No game could justify that, after the exposure they’ve given these characters. 

Radiant Dawn’s endgame is designed to be a crowning moment of awesome for the saga. The point of it isn’t exactly to challenge you-- it’s there to gratify you. It is designed to let you indulge in using these nigh legendary characters, weapons and spells, the sort of retaliation one imagines is necessary if there is to be hope in defeating a Goddess championed by countless, oft-revived soldiers. It’s there to make you feel good for sticking with the games, and I for one believe it succeeds at it in part thanks to the inclusion of the royals. Because the one thing that would have really sucked is never seeing Caineghis battle. We needed to experience just how absolutely formidable he is. How Giffca’s claim that Ashnard was no threat to his king was no boast. 

Alan: I’ve never really liked Laguz, but I’ve particularly never been a fan of how they work in RD. They’re either so weak they die while in human form or decently strong, but not earning any exp, in beast form. As such, I think they’re gimmicky and overall just not that good.

Laguz royals though. They’re mega rad. Some people might think “This game’s telling me that all the units I worked for to get here are worthless now,” but you can also think of it another way. If you made it this far, the game wants to ensure that you can see it through to the end. That’s why we usually get Gotohs in most games, but Radiant Dawn gives you SO MANY that it’s a little ridiculous. And I love it. The fact that the game talks up how strong the Laguz kings are and then they let you play with it the one time the game can reasonably find the excuse to put them all in your hands at the same time leads to a very empowering endgame romp.

_________________________________________________________________________

Criticism: Biorhythm Sucks

 Grant: I haven’t noticed the effect that biorhythm has had on Radiant Dawn. I find the complaints of this to be wholly exaggerated. It really doesn’t affect much of the game, if at all. 

Braden: Biorhythm is almost entirely insignificant. It definitely doesn’t have any reason to keep it around, but it doesn’t make the game unplayable to the extent that some people seem to exaggerate it to at times. 

Alan: Biorhythm is kind of lame, but it’s not that big of a deal. The only times I can think of it actually being a pain is Hard Mode Part 1, where the Dawn Brigade kind of needs to be at their best at all times and stats aren’t high enough to make it less of a factor.

________________________________________________________________________